Resources

AI and language barriers

• Luo, Q. & Puett, M. (2024). Anglo-American bias could make generative AI an invisible intellectual cage. Nature, 629, 1004-1004. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01573-9
• Martin, P.P., Graulich, N. (2024) Beyond language barriers: allowing multiple languages in postsecondary chemistry classes through multilingual machine learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10087-4
• Choudhury, M. (2023). Generative AI has a language problem. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 1802-1803. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01716-4
• Simons, G.F., Thomas, A.L.L. & White, C.K.K. (2022). Assessing digital language support on a global scale. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 4299–4305, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea. International Committee on Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.379

Evidence syntheses

• Razak, T.B., Budaya, R.R., Hukom, F.D., Subhan, B., Assakina, F.K., Fauziah, S. et al. (2024). Long-term dynamics of hard coral cover across Indonesia. Coral Reefs. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02540-6
• Ardiantiono, Pinondang, I.M.R., Chandradewi, D.S., Semiadi, G., Pattiselanno, F., Supriatna, J. et al. (2024). Insights from 20 years of mammal population research in Indonesia. Oryx, 58, 485-492. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605323001539
• Berger-Tal, O., Wong, B.B.M., Adams, C.A., Blumstein, D.T., Candolin, U., Gibson, M.J. et al. (2024). Leveraging AI to improve evidence synthesis in conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 39, 548-557. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2024.04.007
• Khraisha, Q., Put, S., Kappenberg, J., Warraitch, A. & Hadfield, K. (2024). Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT‐4’s efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer‐reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages. Research Synthesis Methods. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1715
• Díaz-Reviriego, I., Hanspach, J., Torralba, M., Ortiz-Przychodzka, S., Benavides Frias, C., Burke, L., García-Martín, M., Oteros-Rozas, E. (2024) Appraising biocultural approaches to sustainability in the scientific literature in Spanish. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01969-3
• Zenni, R.D., Barlow, J., Pettorelli, N., Stephens, P., Rader, R., Siqueira, T. et al. (2023). Multi-lingual literature searches are needed to unveil global knowledge. Journal of Applied Ecology, 60, 380-383. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14370
• Spillias, S., Kelly, R., Cottrell, R. S., O’Brien, K. R., Im, R.-Y., Kim, J. Y. et al. (2023). The empirical evidence for the social-ecological impacts of seaweed farming. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, 2, e0000042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000042
• Anzai, W., Ban, K., Hagiwara, S., Kako, T., Kashiwagi, N., Kawase, K. et al. (2022). Quantifying the 60-year contribution of Japanese zoos and aquariums to peer-reviewed scientific research. Animals, 12, 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12050598
• Dresser, C., Hart, A., Kwok-Keung Law, A., Yen Yen Poon, G., Ciottone, G. & Balsari, S. (2022). Where are people dying in disasters, and where is it being studied? A mapping review of scientific articles on tropical cyclone mortality in English and Chinese. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X22000541
• Khanna, S., Ball, J., Alperin, J. P. & Willinsky, J. (2022) Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process. Quantitative Science Studies, 3, 912-930. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00228
• Tatiana, C., Quentin, S., Mayra, C., Diego, M. & Olivier, D. (2022) Arthropod-related ecosystem services and disservices in smallholder farming in low and middle income countries. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100133
• Katayama, N., Uchida, H., Kusumoto, Y. & Iida, T. (2022) Bird use of fruit orchards and vineyards in Japan: mitigating a knowledge gap with a systematic review of published and grey literature. Ornithological Science, 21, 93-114. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.21.93
• Hunter, N. B., North, M. A. & Slotow, R. (2021) The marginalisation of voice in the fight against climate change: The case of Lusophone Africa. Environmental Science & Policy 120, 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.012
• Rovira, C., Codina, L. & Lopezosa, C. (2021) Language bias in the Google Scholar ranking algorithm. Future Internet 13, 31. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fi13020031
• Kulczycki, E., Guns, R., Pölönen, J., Engels, T. C. E., Rozkosz, E. A., Zuccala, A. A., Bruun, K., Eskola, O. Starčič, A. I.,Petr, M. & Sivertsen, G. (2020) Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven-country European study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71, 1371–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24336
• El País (2020) El año en que Cajal inventó una vacuna y no se enteró nadie porque lo anunció en español [The year Cajal invented a vaccine and no one found out because he announced it in Spanish]. https://elpais.com/ciencia/2020-05-25/el-ano-en-que-cajal-invento-una-vacuna-y-no-se-entero-nadie-porque-lo-anuncio-en-espanol.html
• Homolak, J., Kodvanj, I. & Virag, D. (2020) Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: a call for open science in the times of closed borders. Scientometrics 124, 2687–2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03587-2
• Fernández-Bellon, D. (2020) Limited accessibility and bias in wildlife-wind energy knowledge: A bilingual systematic review of a globally distributed bird group. Science of The Total Environment 737, 140238. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140238
• Preble, J.H., Ohte, N. & Vincenot, C.E. (2020) In the shadow of the rising sun: a systematic review of Japanese bat research and conservation. Mammal Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12226
• Teo, H.C., Campos-Arceiz, A., Li, B.V., Wu, M. & Lechner, A.M. (2020) Building a green Belt and Road: A systematic review and comparative assessment of the Chinese and English-language literature. PLOS ONE 15, e0239009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239009
• Vera-Baceta, M.-A., Thelwall, M. & Kousha, K. (2019) Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics 121, 1803-1813. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z
• Petrovan, S.O. & Schmidt, B.R. (2019) Neglected juveniles; a call for integrating all amphibian life stages in assessments of mitigation success (and how to do it). Biological Conservation 236, 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.023
• Walpole, S. C. (2019) Including papers in languages other than English in systematic reviews: important, feasible, yet often omitted. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 111, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.004
• Uetz, P. & Stylianou, A. (2018) The original descriptions of reptiles and their subspecies. Zootaxa 4375, 257-264. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4375.2.5
• Lazarev, V.S. & Nazarovets, S.A. (2018) Don’t dismiss citations to journals not published in English. Nature 556, 174. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-04169-2
• Neimann Rasmussen, L. & Montgomery, P. (2018) The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in Campbell systematic reviews: a survey and meta-epidemiological study. Systematic Reviews 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0786-6
• Blicharska, M., Smithers, R. J., Kuchler, M., et al. (2017). Steps to overcome the North–South divide in research relevant to climate change policy and practice. Nature Climate Change, 7, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3163
• Cohen, J.F., Korevaar, D.A., Wang, J., Spijker, R. & Bossuyt, P.M. (2015). Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews? Systtematic Review, 4, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0017-3
• Baethge, C. (2013) The production and recognition of psychiatric original articles published in languages other than English. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-102
• Morrison, A., Polisena, J., Husereau, D., Moulton, K., Clark, M., Fiander, M., Mierzwinski-Urban, M., Clifford, T., Hutton, B. & Rabb, D. (2012). The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 28, 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000086
• Gordon, A. (2012) The invisibility of science publications in hebrew: A comparative database study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63, 607-615. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21704
• Song, F., Parekh, S., Hooper, L., Loke, Y. K., Ryder, J., Sutton, A. J., Hing, C., Kwok, C. S., Pang, C., Harvey, I. (2010) Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technology Assessment 14, 8. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14080
• Fung, I.C.H. (2008) Citation of non-English peer review publications – some Chinese examples. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 5, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-12
• Karlsson, S., Srebotnjak, T., & Gonzales, P. (2007) Understanding the North–South knowledge divide and its implications for policy: a quantitative analysis of the generation of scientific knowledge in the environmental sciences. Environmental Science & Policy, 10, 668-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.04.001
• Pan, Z., Trikalinos, T.A., Kavvoura, F.K., Lau, J. & Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2005) Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: an empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature. PLOS Medicine 2, e334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020334
• Pham, B., Klassen, T. P., Lawson, M. L., & Moher, D. (2005) Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58, 769-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.021
• Cyranoski, D. (2004) Bird flu data languish in Chinese journals. Nature 430, 955. https://doi.org/10.1038/430955a
• Jüni, P., Holenstein, F., Sterne, J., Bartlett, C., & Egger, M. (2002) Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.1.115
• Egger, M., Zellweger-Zähner, T., Schneider, M., Junker, C., Lengeler, C., & Antes, G. (1997) Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet, 350, 326–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)02419-7
• Grégoire, G., Derderian, F. & Le Lorier, J. (1995) Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 48, 159-163. 1016/0895-4356(94)00098-b

Science communication

• Sélem-Mojica, N., Karakulak, T., Anjum, A., Pashkov, A., Pérez-Estrada, R., Enriquez-Guillén, K. et al. (2024). Closing the computational biology ‘knowledge gap’: Spanish Wikipedia as a case study. Bioinformatics, 40, i11-i19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae247
• Richards, D., Worden, D., Song, X.P. & Lavorel, S. (2024). Harnessing generative artificial intelligence to support nature‐based solutions. People and Nature, 6, 882-893. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10622
• Rakotomanana, H., Razanamaro, O.H.M., Ravelomanana, A., Andriantsaralaza, S., Rafalinirina, A.H., Razanaparany, T.P., Ratsimbazafy, J., Rabakonandrianina, E. & Goodman, S.M. (2024). ATBC 2019 in Madagascar: its impact on the national scientific community. Biotropica, 56, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13277
• Seale, E., Reaume, M., Batista, R., Eddeen, A.B., Roberts, R., Rhodes, E. et al. (2022). Patient–physician language concordance and quality and safety outcomes among frail home care recipients admitted to hospital in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 194, E899-E908. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.212155
• Büttner, B., Firat, M. & Raiteri, E. (2022). Patents and knowledge diffusion: The impact of machine translation. Research Policy, 51, 104584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104584
• Higham, K. & Nagaoka, S. (2022) Language barriers and the speed of knowledge diffusion. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 22-E-074. https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/22e074.pdf
• Steigerwald, E., Ramírez-Castañeda, V., Brandt, D.Y.C., Báldi, A., Shapiro, J.T., Bowker, L. et al. (2022). Overcoming language barriers in academia: machine translation tools and a vision for a multilingual future. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac062
• Dreisbach, J.L, (2022). The role of languaging in planetary health. The Lancet Planetary Health 6, e385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S254b2-5196(22)00095-X
• Wang, Y. & Mumby, H. (2022). Differences in reporting human-wild boar interactions in Chinese and English news media. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2022.2057623
• Pérez-Llantada, C. (2021) Genres and languages in science communication: The multiple dimensions of the science-policy interface. Language & Communication 78, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.02.004
• Kim H.N., Lan K.F., Nkyekyer E., Neme, S., Pierre-Louis, M., Chew, L. & Duber, H.C. (2020) Assessment of disparities in COVID-19 testing and infection across language groups in Seattle, Washington. JAMA Netw Open. 3(9): e2021213. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21213
• Matthews, K. R., Yang, E., Lewis, S. W., Vaidyanathan, B. R., & Gorman, M. (2020) International scientific collaborative activities and barriers to them in eight societies. Accountability in Research, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1774373
• Cheung, H., Mazerolle, L., Possingham, H.P., Tam, K.-P., Biggs, D., 2020. A methodological guide for translating study instruments in cross-cultural research: Adapting the ‘connectedness to nature’ scale into Chinese. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13465
• ÓhÉigeartaigh, S.S., Whittlestone, J., Liu, Y., Zeng, Y. & Liu, Z. (2020) Overcoming barriers to cross-cultural cooperation in governance. Philosophy & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00402-x
• Mori, A.S. (2020) Next-generation meetings must be diverse and inclusive. Nature Climate Change 10, 481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0795-z
• Márquez, M.C. & Porras, A.M. (2020) Science communication in multiple languages is critical to its effectiveness. Frontiers in Communication 5, 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00031
• Barath, H. (2019) Indian initiatives aim to break science’s language barrier. Nature 571, 289-290. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01815-1
• Fabian, Y., Bollmann, K., Brang, P., Heiri, C., Olschewski, R., Rigling, A., Stofer, S., Holderegger, R. (2019) How to close the science-practice gap in nature conservation? Information sources used by practitioners. Biological Conservation 235, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.011
• Saha, S., Afrad M.M.H., Saha, S. & Saha, S.K. (2019) Towards making global health research truly global. Lancet Global Health 7, PE1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30259-1
• Dew, K.N., Turner, A.M., Choi, Y.K., Bosold, A., Kirchhoff, K. (2018) Development of machine translation technology for assisting health communication: A systematic review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 85, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.018
• Giehl, E.L.H., Moretti, M., Walsh, J.C., Batalha, M.A., Cook, C.N. (2017) Scientific Evidence and Potential Barriers in the Management of Brazilian Protected Areas. PLOS ONE 12, e0169917. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169917
• Huttner-Koros, A., Perera, S. (2016) Communicating science in English: a preliminary exploration into the professional self-perceptions of Australian scientists from language backgrounds other than English. Journal of Science Communication 15. https://dx.doi.org/10.22323/2.15060203
• Müller, J., Opgenoorth, L. (2014) On the gap between science and conservation implementation – a national park perspective. Basic and Applied Ecology 15, 373-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2014.03.002
• Primack, R.B. (2013) Locally adapted textbooks can help biodiversity. BioScience 63, 926-927. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.12.5
• The PLOS Medicine Editors (2006) Ich weiss nicht was soll es bedeuten: language matters in medicine. PLOS Medicine 3, e122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0030122
• Gulbrandsen, P., Schroeder, T.V., Milerad, J. & Nylenna, M. (2002) Paper or screen, mother tongue or English: which is better? A randomized trial. JAMA 287, 2851-2853. 1001/jama.287.21.2851
• Primack, R.B. (2001) Publish again in another language. Conservation Biology 15, 290-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00201.x
• Nature Cell Biology (2001) Breaking the language barrier. Nature Cell Biology 3, E89. https://doi.org/10.1038/35070145
• Guha, B. (1985) Study on the language barrier in the production, dissemination and use of scientific and technical information with special reference to the problems of the developing countries. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.

Publishing, education, and career development

• Zhao, D. & Rubini, M. (2024). Improving English proficiency for scientific communication by non-fluent speakers. Nature Reviews Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-024-01102-1
• Kobak, D., Márquez, R.G., Horvát, E.-Á. & Lause, J. (2024). Delving into ChatGPT usage in academic writing through excess vocabulary. arXiv, 2406.07016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.07016
• Cao, Y., Sickles, RC, Triebs TP & Tumlinson, J. (2024) Linguistic distance to English impedes research performance. Research Policy, 53, 104971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.104971
• Carlsson, S.V., Esteves, S.C., Grobet-Jeandin, E., Masone, M.C., Ribal, M.J. & Zhu, Y. (2024) Being a non-native English speaker in science and medicine. Nature Review Urology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00839-7
• Zenni, R.D. & Andrew, N.R. (2023). Artificial Intelligence text generators for overcoming language barriers in ecological research communication. Austral Ecology, 48, 1225-1229. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aec.13417
• Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E. & Zou, J. (2023) GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. Patterns, 4, 100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779
• Seghier, M. L. (2023) Using ChatGPT and other AI‐assisted tools to improve manuscripts readability and language. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 33, 773-775. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ima.22902
• Deng, J.M. & Flynn, A.B. (2023) “I am working 24/7, but I can’t translate that to you”: the barriers, strategies, and needed supports reported by chemistry trainees from English-as-an-additional language backgrounds. Journal of Chemical Education, 100, 1523–1536. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01063
• Fox, C.W., Meyer, J. & Aimé, E. (2023) Double-blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 37, 1144-1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14259
• Smith, O.M., Davis, K.L., Pizza, R.B., Waterman, R., Dobson, K.C., Foster, B., et al. (2023) Peer review perpetuates barriers for historically excluded groups. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7, 512-523. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-01999-w
• Carroll, E.L. & Sironi, M. (2023) Enhancing the impact and inclusivity of research by embracing multilingual science communication. Marine Mammal Science, 39, 351-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12991
• Anikina, Z. (2021) Don’t focus on English at the expense of your science. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01905-z
• Politzer-Ahles, S., Girolamo T. & Ghali, S. (2020) Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in academic reviewing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47, 100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100895
• Ramírez-Castañeda, V. (2020) Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences. PLOS ONE 15, e0238372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238372
• Romero-Olivares AL (2019) Reviewers, don’t be rude to nonnative English speakers. Science http://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.aaz7179
• Stockemer, D. & Wigginton, M.J. (2019) Publishing in English or another language: an inclusive study of scholar’s language publication preferences in the natural, social and interdisciplinary sciences. Scientometrics 118, 645-652. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2987-0
• Nuñez, M.A., Barlow, J., Cadotte, M., Lucas, K., Newton, E., Pettorelli, N. & Stephens, P.A. (2019) Assessing the uneven global distribution of readership, submissions and publications in applied ecology: Obvious problems without obvious solutions. Journal of Applied Ecology 56, 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13319
• Rios Rojas C (2018) Students need guidance in languages they speak. Nature 564: 163. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07674-6
• Villar, R. (2018) The importance of language. Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery 5: 1–2. http://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hny002
• Deczkowska A (2017) Let’s talk about language barriers. Science 356: 978. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.356.6341.978
• Di Bitetti, M.S., Ferreras, J.A. (2017) Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio 46, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0820-7
• Ballabeni, A. (2015) Levelling the lingo playing field. EMBO Reports 16, 769-770. https://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201540724
• Lillis, T., Curry, M.J. (2015) The politics of English, language and uptake, In Theory in applied linguistics research: critical approaches to production, performance and participation. ed. L. T. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. https://benjamins.com/catalog/aila.28.06lil/fulltext/aila.28.06lil.pdf
• López-Navarro, I., Moreno, A.I., Quintanilla, M.Á. & Rey-Rocha, J. (2015) Why do I publish research articles in English instead of my own language? Differences in Spanish researchers’ motivations across scientific domains. Scientometrics 103, 939-976. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1570-1
• Powel, K. (2014) Publishing: Foreign tongues. Nature 487: 129–131. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7405-129a
• Śliwa, M., & Johansson, M. (2014) How non-native English-speaking staff are evaluated in linguistically diverse organizations: A sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 45:1133-1151. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.21
• Diekhoff, T., Schlattmann, P., Dewey, M. (2013) Impact of article language in multi-language medical journals – a bibliometric analysis of self-
  citations and impact factor. PLOS ONE 8: e76816. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076816
• Bortolus, A. (2012) Running like Alice and losing good ideas: on the quasi-compulsive use of English by non-native English speaking scientists. AMBIO 41, 769-772. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0339-5
• van Raan, T., van Leeuwen, T. & Visser, M. (2011) Non-English papers decrease rankings. Nature 469, 34-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/469034a
• Clavero, M. (2011) Language bias in ecological journals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9: 93-94. https://doi.org/10.1890/11.WB.001
• Clavero, M. (2011) Unfortunately, linguistic injustice matters. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 156-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.011
• Clavero, M. (2010) “Awkward wording. Rephrase”: linguistic injustice in ecological journals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 552-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.001
• Herrera, A.J. (1999) Language bias discredits the peer-review system. Nature 397: 467-467. https://doi.org/10.1038/17194